As shown in the YouTube clip, South Australian libraries are one example where a state-wide LMS has been implemented. This presents both advantages and disadvantages.
A country library
Surveys following Libraries SA One Card network implementation highlight that one advantage is smaller libraries have access to a resource which otherwise would be out of reach (Libraries SA, 2014). However, country libraries may have limited on-site support and training compared to metro areas if the LMS provider is located centrally.
Library user
As the video highlights, a state-wide LMS allows access to a much larger collection and offers patrons flexibility and convenience as they can borrow and return at any library. One drawback though is the potential confusion surrounding different borrowing rules between libraries.
Library space
Finally, a state-wide LMS can free up physical space required to hold collections, given that libraries can draw on other libraries’ collections. Again, using Libraries SA as a case study, 42% of libraries stated they are more considerate of the number of copies they purchase due to having a state-wide LMS (Libraries SA, 2014). However, if less physical copies are available there is potential to alienate users who prefer to browse in-person.
Reference
Libraries SA. (2014). ILMS outcomes summary brochure. https://www.libraries.sa.gov.au/custom/web/PLS/1LMS_Outcomes_Summary_Brochure_-_A4.pdf
Kelly Scott 
Good discussion. Although the LMS provider may be located centrally, country libraries still have access to them, and this is a level of expertise they would not have in their own library.
LikeLike